基于不同PPP模型的北斗三号相位小数偏差估计与新特性分析

Estimation and characteristics analysis of BDS-3 uncalibrated phase delay based on different PPP models

  • 摘要: 相位小数偏差(UPD)的精确估计是实现精密单点定位(PPP)非差模糊度固定的重要前提. 常用的PPP模型主要分为无电离层组合(IF)模型与非差非组合模型两类,针对两类模型所采用的UPD估计方法有所不同. 首先从理论上推导证明了在采用相同处理策略的前提下,基于IF模型与非差非组合模型UPD估计的一致性;进一步采用全球均匀分布的45个国际GNSS服务(IGS)测站观测数据估计了北斗三号全球卫星导航系统(BDS-3) UPD产品,并分析两种估计模型获得的UPD产品的时间稳定性与一致性. 结果表明:BDS-3宽巷(WL) UPD与窄巷(NL) UPD均保持较高的稳定性,10日WL UPD的平均标准差为0.060 7,单日NL UPD平均标准差为0.059 9. 针对北斗二号卫星导航系统(BDS-2),两种模型估计得到的UPD结果具有较高的一致性;然而,BDS-3卫星的UPD结果出现与卫星轨道类型和生产厂家的相关特性,不同轨道类型、不同生产厂家之间的卫星UPD存在0.5周左右的显著差异,同一轨道类型、同一生产厂家的北斗卫星之间具有一致性,推测BDS-3不同轨道类型、不同生产厂家生产的卫星对应的接收机端硬件延迟存在系统性偏差. 通过估计不同轨道类型、不同生产厂家卫星对应的接收机端硬件延迟偏离进一步验证了该结论,同时探讨了该新特性对于PPP与模糊度固定的影响.

     

    Abstract: Accurate estimation of uncalibrated phase delay (UPD) is an important precondition for ambiguity resolution of precise point positioning (PPP). The commonly used PPP models are mainly divided into the ionosphere-free (IF) combination model and the undifferenced and uncombined model, and the UPD estimation methods used for the two models are different. In this paper, the consistency of UPD estimation based on IF combination model and uncombined model is proved theoretically under the premise of using the same processing strategy. Furthermore, the UPD products of BDS-3 were estimated by using the observation data of 45 International GNSS Service (IGS) stations uniformly distributed around the world, and the time stability and consistency of UPD products obtained by the two estimation models were analyzed. The results show that the UPD of wide-lane and narrow-lane in BDS-3 maintain high stability. The average standard deviation of UPD of wide-lane in ten days is 0.0607, and that of narrow-lane in one day is 0.059 9. For BDS-2 satellites, the UPD results estimated by the two models are highly consistent. However, the UPD results of BDS-3 satellites are related to the characteristics of satellite orbit types and manufacturers. There is a significant difference in UPD between different orbit types and manufacturers of about 0.5 weeks, but there is consistency among BDS satellites of the same orbit type and manufacturer. It can be concluded that the hardware delay of the receiver corresponding to satellites produced by different orbital types and different manufacturers of BDS-3 has a systematic deviation. The estimation of inter-satellite-type bias in PPP further demonstrates this conclusion. Finally, the impact of these biased on PPP and PPP AR was carefully discussed.

     

/

返回文章
返回