GNSS World of China

Volume 46 Issue 1
Feb.  2021
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
PENG Jinsong. Accuracy analysis of single-point positioning in pseudo-range combined with BDS-3 new frequency and Galileo single frequency[J]. GNSS World of China, 2021, 46(1): 57-61. doi: 10.12265/j.gnss.2020102001
Citation: PENG Jinsong. Accuracy analysis of single-point positioning in pseudo-range combined with BDS-3 new frequency and Galileo single frequency[J]. GNSS World of China, 2021, 46(1): 57-61. doi: 10.12265/j.gnss.2020102001

Accuracy analysis of single-point positioning in pseudo-range combined with BDS-3 new frequency and Galileo single frequency

doi: 10.12265/j.gnss.2020102001
  • Received Date: 2020-10-20
    Available Online: 2021-04-06
  • Publish Date: 2021-02-15
  • In order to compare and analyze BDS-3/Galileo compatible frequency pseudorange single-point positioning accuracy, based on the measured data of MGEX distributed tracking stations, singal point positioning accuracy of pseudorange combination of dual-system compatible frequencies and non-compatible frequenry of BDS-3 and Galileo are analyzed, together with that of single frequency of BDS-3 and Galileo respectively. It is found through research that BDS-3/Galileo combination effectively improves the visible number of satellites and the geometric structure of satellite spatial distribution compared to a single system. In terms of single system positioning, the single point positioning accuracy of B1C and B2a pseudorange of BDS-3 is better than that of comesponding compatible frequenry of Galileo. In terms of dual-system positioning, the single point positioning accuracy of compatible frequenry pseudorange combination of BDS-3/Galileo is better than that of non-compatible frequenry combination. and the dual-system combination positioning improves the Galileo single-system positioning accuracy better BDS-3, which indicates that the design of BDS-3 compatible frequency effectively improves the compatibility with Galileo system.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    金俭俭, 高成发, 张瑞成, 等. GPS与BDS2、BDS3融合数据短基线解算精度分析[J]. 测绘通报, 2020(3): 83-86, 95.
    [2]
    方欣颀, 范磊. BDS-2/BDS-3伪距单点定位精度分析[J]. 全球定位系统, 2020, 45(1): 19-25.
    [3]
    谢明德. BDS-3三频精密单点定位精度分析[J]. 全球定位系统, 2020, 45(1): 71-76.
    [4]
    戴金倩, 吴迪, 戴小蕾, 等. BDS-3实时精密单点定位精度分析[J]. 测绘通报, 2020(1): 30-34.
    [5]
    王利华, 周定杰, 刘鸿飞, 等. GPS、GLONASS、BDS、Galileo动态精密单点定位精度及收敛时间分析[J]. 测绘地理信息, 2020(4): 64-69.
    [6]
    尹志豪, 王广兴, 胡志刚, 等. 北斗三号观测数据质量分析[J]. 测绘科学, 2020, 45(6): 37-45.
    [7]
    曹相, 王庆, 高成发, 等. 基于BDS-3、GPS和Galileo重叠频率观测值的紧组合RTK定位方法[J]. 仪器仪表学报, 2019, 40(10): 138-144.
    [8]
    刘凡, 李雷, 刘国林, 等. BDS-2与BDS-3卫星空间信号精度评估[J]. 测绘科学, 2020, 45(1): 54-61, 76.
    [9]
    张乾坤, 刘小生, 何琦敏. BDS-3多频点伪距单点定位性能研究[J]. 测绘通报, 2020(1): 71-75.
    [10]
    吴明魁, 刘万科, 张小红, 等. GPS/Galileo/BDS-3试验星短基线紧组合相对定位性能初步评估[J]. 武汉大学学报(信息科学版), 2020, 45(1): 13-20.
    [11]
    谭理庆, 黄亮, 杜仲进, 等. BDS/Galileo系统观测数据质量分析[J]. 全球定位系统, 2019, 44(6): 27-34.
    [12]
    李湘梅, 陆兆峰, 左小清, 等. BDS/GLONASS/GALILEO多模组合单点定位性能比较分析[J]. 城市勘测, 2019(2): 101-106.
    [13]
    布金伟, 左小清, 金立新, 等. BDS/GPS/Galileo多模组合单点定位稳定性分析[J/OL].(2019-03-06)[2020-04-20]. 地球物理学进展. https://oversea.cnki.net/Kcms/detail/detail.aspx?filename=DQWJ2019030201J&dbcode=CJFQ&dbname=CAPJ2019.
    [14]
    刘琳, 席瑞杰. GPS/GLONASS/BDS/Galileo系统载波相位观测值质量对比分析[J]. 全球定位系统, 2019, 44(1): 16-22.
    [15]
    布金伟, 左小清, 李海强, 等. BDS/Galileo组合伪距单点定位性能测试与分析[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2019(5): 1707-1713. DOI: 10.6038/pg2019BB0588
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(4)  / Tables(3)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (760) PDF downloads(29) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return