GNSS World of China

Volume 43 Issue 5
Oct.  2018
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Article Navigation >  GNSS World of China  > 2018  >  43(5): 91-97
YU Xiaona, WANG Chao, ZUO Xiaoqing, BU Jinwei, CHANG Jun. Performance Analysis of Multimode SPP Solving for  BDS／GPS／GALILEO at Different Cut-Off Height Angles[J]. GNSS World of China, 2018, 43(5): 91-97. doi: 10.13442/j.gnss.1008-9268.2018.05.017
Citation: YU Xiaona, WANG Chao, ZUO Xiaoqing, BU Jinwei, CHANG Jun. Performance Analysis of Multimode SPP Solving for  BDS／GPS／GALILEO at Different Cut-Off Height Angles[J]. GNSS World of China, 2018, 43(5): 91-97. doi: 10.13442/j.gnss.1008-9268.2018.05.017
shu

Performance Analysis of Multimode SPP Solving for  BDS／GPS／GALILEO at Different Cut-Off Height Angles

doi: 10.13442/j.gnss.1008-9268.2018.05.017
  • 1.

    School of Land and Resources Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650093, China

  • 2.

    School of Information, Renmin University of China, Beijing, 100872,China

  • 3.

    First survey team of State Bureau of Surveying and Mapping Geographic Information,Xi'an 710054, China

  • Publish Date: 2018-10-15
    Abstract
  • This paper selects the observation data of February 1st, 2016, which is part of the MGEX tracking station, in the case of cut-off elevation angles of 5°, 15°, 25°, 30°, 40°, and 45°, respectively,This paper analyzes the positioning performance of single point positioning (SPP) of six combined modes of BDS(C), GPS(G), GPS+BDS(GC), BDS+GALILEO(CE), GPS+GALILEO(GE),and GPS+BDS+GALILEO(GCE). Research indicates: the stability of GPS+BDS+GALILEO(GCE) is the best. At the same height, the number of satellites is the highest, the rate of epoch availability is highest, which is 96％, compared with other combination modes, the positioning accuracy increased by 20％~40％. It has good application value in denselypacked areas, mountains, forests, and areas with severe shelter.

     

    • FullText(HTML)
  • loading
    • References(16)
  • [1]
    邹波. GPS／BDS组合系统单点定位及精度分析［D］.合肥：合肥工业大学,2015.
    [2]
    王趁香,葛茂荣,祝会忠,等.GPS、BDS与GPS／BDS伪距单点定位与差分定位精度分析［J］.导航定位学报,2017,5(3):84-89.
    [3]
    布金伟,李小龙,左小清,等.Beidou／GPS／GLONASS多系统卫星定位数据质量比较分析［J］.地球物理学进展,2018,33(1):1-9.
    [4]
    布金伟,左小清,常军,等.GNSS多星定位数据的质量分析［J］.昆明理工大学学报(自然科学版),2017,42(6):24-36.
    [5]
    吴玲,孙永荣,俞晓磊,等.GPS／GLONASS／GALILEO多星座组合导航系统研究［J］.中国空间科学技术,2009,29(3):23-28.
    [6]
    王惠南. GPS导航原理与应用［M］. 北京:科学出版社,2013.
    [7]
    王晓波,钱枫,金丽华.“北斗二号”导航定位系统与GPS伪距单点定位性能对比研究［J］.测绘与空间地理信息,2016,39(2):97-99，103.
    [8]
    陈浩,许长辉,高井祥,等.BDS、GPS及其组合系统伪距单点定位精度分析［J］.山东科技大学学报(自然科学版),2015,34(2):72-78.
    [9]
    魏二虎,刘学习,刘经南.北斗+GPS组合单点定位精度评价与分析［J］.测绘通报,2017(5):1-5.
    [10]
    李鹤峰,党亚民,秘金钟,等.BDS与GPS、GLONASS多模融合导航定位时空统一［J］.大地测量与地球动力学,2013,33(4):73-78.
    [11]
    贾雪,徐炜.GPS／BDS／GALILEO多系统融合伪距单点定位性能分析［J］.全球定位系统,2017,42(6):16-23.
    [12]
    刘庆元,包海,王虎,等.GPS、GLONASS、GALILEO三大系统间时间系统以及坐标系统的转换［J］.测绘科学,2008(5):13-15.
    [13]
    魏子卿.2000中国大地坐标系及其与WGS84的比较［J］.大地测量与地球动力学,2008(5):1-5.
    [14]
    陈立. BDS／GPS组合系统伪距单点定位算法研究［D］.南京：南京理工大学,2017.
    [15]
    袁宏超,秘金钟,高猛,等.双导航定位系统伪距单点定位方法与精度分析［J］.导航定位学报,2014,2(3):38-43.
    [16]
    任晓东,张柯柯,李星星,等.BeiDou、Galileo、GLONASS、GPS多系统融合精密单点［J］.测绘学报,2015,44(12):1307-1313，1339.
    • Relative Articles
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索
    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (455) PDF downloads(116) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    Copyright © 2009《 GNSS World of China 》 Editorial Office

    Address：84 Jianshe Dong Lu, Muye District, Xinxiang City, Henan Province, ChinaChina Pos：453000Tel：0373-3712411Fax：0373-3052232Email：qqdwxt@126.com

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd    

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return