GNSS World of China

Volume 43 Issue 4
Aug.  2018
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
LI Yongtao, LI Jianwen, PANG Peng, LIU Dezhi, LI Jing. Analysis of the Magnetic Storm’s Influence on Ionospheric in September 2017[J]. GNSS World of China, 2018, 43(4): 42-47. doi: 10.13442/j.gnss.1008-9268.2018.04.008
Citation: LI Yongtao, LI Jianwen, PANG Peng, LIU Dezhi, LI Jing. Analysis of the Magnetic Storm’s Influence on Ionospheric in September 2017[J]. GNSS World of China, 2018, 43(4): 42-47. doi: 10.13442/j.gnss.1008-9268.2018.04.008

Analysis of the Magnetic Storm’s Influence on Ionospheric in September 2017

doi: 10.13442/j.gnss.1008-9268.2018.04.008
  • Publish Date: 2018-09-21
  • In order to study the effect of magnetic storm on the change of ionospheric TEC, this paper collects TEC global grid data from iGMAS and storm Dst index provided by SEPC during solar grade X93 large flares and magnetic storms on September 6 in 2017, and analyzes the correlation in different stages of magnetic storm between Dst index and TEC at different latitudes in the process of the magnetic storm. The results show that: 1)The large magnetic storm occurres 13 hours after the outbreak of the large flare, and the correlation coefficient between the ionospheric TEC lagging 1 hour and Dst index of the main phase during the magnetic storm is -09997, The ionospheric total electron content increase rapidly with the inten sification of magnetic starms, then decreases rapidly and tends to be stable during the recovery phase; 2) The change of TEC varies with the change of Dst index of magnetic storm, and the trends of the two changes are the same. The intensity of magnetic storm has a strong negative correlation with the change of TEC. The effect of magnetic storm on TEC of different latitudes tends to be consistent, and the degree of influence declines gradually from high latitude to low latitude; 3) The TEC changes in the high, medium and low latitudes after the magnetic storms are not synchronized. and the effect is taken in high, medium and low order. The delay of the influence on the different latitudes during the main phase of the magnetic storm is about 1 hour. The delay between Dst index and TEC delay gradually disappears during the recovery phase. With the storm reducing weak the ionospheric TEC change tends to be stable; 4) The abnormal changes of TEC occurre during the phase of magnetic storm recovery need to be further studied and analyzed.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    GOMEY D J. Solar cycle effects on the nearEarth space environment[J]. Reviews of Geophysics, 1990, 28(3):315-336.
    [2]
    丁宗华,陈春.电离层色散效应对线极化雷达信号的影响分析[J].电波科学学报,2011,26(1):30-34.
    [3]
    赵海山,杨力,徐世依,等.基于电离层层析技术的欧洲区域磁暴期间电离层变化研究[C].//中国卫星导航学术年会,2017.
    [4]
    武业文.利用全球导航卫星研究电离层总电子含量特性[D].西安:西安电子科技大学,2013.
    [5]
    郭达志,张随甲.电离层TEC的预测模型[J],测绘工程, 2010, 19(1): 5-8.
    [6]
    李志刚,程宗颐,冯初刚,等.电离层预报模型研究[J],地球物理学报,2007,50(2):327-337.
    [7]
    郭英,高星伟.卫星定位中电离层与轨道的误差估计理论[M].北京:测绘出版社, 2015.
    [8]
    百度百科.地磁暴[EB/OL].https://baike.baidu.com/item/%E5%9C%B0%E7%A3%81%E6%9A%B4/10968380?fr=aladdin,201710.
    [9]
    邹自明.太阳风扰动的地磁响应与空间环境应用模式集成[D].合肥:中国科学技术大学,2014.
    [10]
    李正.电离层暴及“行星际扰动磁暴电离层暴”的观测研究[D].中国科学院研究生院(空间科学与应用研究中心),2011.
    [11]
    佟昕,宋婕.谈统计学中的相关与回归分析[J]. 辽宁经济管理干部学院(辽宁经济职业技术学院学报),2011,(05):17-18.
    [12]
    程征伟.磁层电离层耦合场向电流研究[D].北京:中国科学院研究生院(空间科学与应用研究中心),2007.
    [13]
    程征伟,史建魁,ZHANG T L,等.磁尾的等离子体片边界层场向电流密度与地磁活动指数Kp的关系分析[J].北京:中国科学(技术科学),2011,41(11):1499-1504.
    [14]
    乐新安.中低纬电离层模拟与数据同化研究[D].武汉:中国科学院研究生院(武汉物理与数学研究所),2008.
    [15]
    冯建迪,王正涛,时爽爽,等.总电子含量赤道异常变化特性分析[J].测绘科学,2016,41(6):44-47.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (526) PDF downloads(121) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return