GNSS World of China

Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Article Navigation >  GNSS World of China  > 2024  > 
LIN Ziyang, CHEN Longjiang, JIN Ruimin, OU Ming, YANG Huiyun, JI Guangwang, CUI Xiang, GU Mingyue. A random forest-based prediction model for ionospheric foF2 in China and surrounding regions[J]. GNSS World of China. doi: 10.12265/j.gnss.2024140
Citation: LIN Ziyang, CHEN Longjiang, JIN Ruimin, OU Ming, YANG Huiyun, JI Guangwang, CUI Xiang, GU Mingyue. A random forest-based prediction model for ionospheric foF2 in China and surrounding regions[J]. GNSS World of China. doi: 10.12265/j.gnss.2024140
shu

A random forest-based prediction model for ionospheric foF2 in China and surrounding regions

doi: 10.12265/j.gnss.2024140
  • 1.

    China Research Institute of Radiowave Propagation, Qingdao 266107, China

  • 2.

    National Key Laboratory of Electromagnetic Environment, Qingdao 266107, China

  • Received Date: 2024-08-13
    Available Online: 2024-11-01
    Abstract
  • The square of the critical frequency of the ionospheric F2 layer (foF2) is proportional to the peak electron density (NmF2) and serves as a crucial parameter affecting the performance of Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS). Enhancing the prediction accuracy of foF2 is essential for optimizing GNSS broadcast ionospheric models, thereby improving the positioning accuracy of GNSS. This study develops an ionospheric foF2 prediction model for China and its surrounding regions using the random forest algorithm, based on data from 18 ionosonde stations of the China Research Institute of Radiowave Propagation and COSMIC occultation observations. The model incorporates multiple features, including Universal Time, day of the year, geographic location, solar, and geomagnetic activities. A comparative analysis with the International Reference Ionosphere (IRI-2020) model validates the prediction accuracy of our model. The results indicate that the random forest model reduces the mean absolute error by 14.81% and 17.11%, and the root mean square error by 11.21% and 13.14%, compared to the IRI CCIR and IRI URSI models, respectively. Additionally, the model exhibits superior prediction accuracy under various latitudes, local times, solar, and geomagnetic activity conditions when compared to IRI-2020. This research not only significantly enhances the foF2 prediction accuracy for China and its surrounding regions but also lays a critical foundation for improving the accuracy and reliability of GNSS globally.

     

    • FullText(HTML)
  • loading
    • References(30)
  • [1]
    韩喜豪, 郑帅勇, 杨建雷, 等. 卫星导航中电离层误差校正技术现状与发展[J]. 全球定位系统, 2024, 49(2): 111-126. DOI: 10.12265/j.gnss.2023105
    [2]
    刘钝, 李锐. 卫星导航增强中的电离层扰动影响研究——基于系统可靠性工程的视角[J]. 全球定位系统, 2023, 48(1): 3-13. DOI: 10.12265/j.gnss.2022209
    [3]
    BENT R B, LLEWELLYN S K, NESTERCZUK G, et al. The development of a highly-successful worldwide empirical ionospheric model and its use in certain aspects of space communications and worldwide total electron content investigations[C]//Effect of the Ionosphere on Space Systems & Communications, 1975: 12-28.
    [4]
    NAVA B, COISSON P, RADICELLA S M. A new version of the NeQuick ionosphere electron density model[J]. Journal of atmospheric and solar-terrestrial physics, 2008, 70(15): 1856-1862. DOI: 10.1016/j.jastp.2008.01.015
    [5]
    BILITZA D, PEZZOPANE M, TRUHILK V, et al. The international reference ionosphere model: a review and description of an ionospheric benchmark[J]. Reviews of geophysics, 2022, 60(4). DOI: 10.1029/2022RG000792
    [6]
    HUANG F, RUAN H B, LEI J H, et al. Empirical models of foF2 and hmF2 reconstituted by global ionosonde and reanalysis data and COSMIC observations[J]. Space weather, 2024, 22(4): e2023SW003848. DOI: 10.1029/2023SW00384
    [7]
    陈龙江, 甄卫民, 欧明, 等. 一种基于分步线性最优估计的全球中低纬区域电离层foF2重构方法[J]. 电波科学学报, 2021, 36(1): 36-42.
    [8]
    JONES W B, GALLET R M. Representation of diurnal and geographic variations of ionospheric data by numerical methods[J]. Journal of research of the national bureau of standards, 1962, 66(D): 419. DOI: 10.6028/jres.066d.043
    [9]
    RUSH C M, POKEMPNER M, AANDERSON D N, et al. Improving ionospheric maps using theoretically derived values of foF2[J]. Radio science, 1983, 18(1): 195-107. DOI: 10.1029/RS018i001p00095
    [10]
    RUSH C M, POKEMPNER M, ANDERSON D N, et al. Maps of foF2 derived from observations and theoretical data[J]. Radio science, 1984, 19(4): 1083-1097. DOI: 10.1029/RS019i004p01083
    [11]
    E. A, ZHANG D H, XIAO Z, et al. Modeling ionospheric foF2 by using empirical orthogonal function analysis[J]. Annales geophysicae, 2011, 29(8): 1501-1515. DOI: 10.5194/ANGEO-29-1501-2011
    [12]
    HOQUE M M, JAKOWSKI N. A new global empirical NmF2 model for operational use in radio systems[J]. Radio science, 2011, 46(6): 1-13. DOI: 10.1029/2011RS004807
    [13]
    陈林峰, 程云鹏. 基于COSMIC数据开展全球电离层foF2建模及变化特征研究[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2022, 22(34): 15036-15042. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1815.2022.34.007
    [14]
    LIU Z D, FANG H X, HOQUE M M, et al. A new empirical model of NmF2 based on CHAMP, GRACE, and COSMIC radio occultation[J]. Remote sensing, 2019, 11(11): 1386. DOI: 10.3390/rs11111386
    [15]
    THEMENS D R, JAYACHANDRAN P T, GALKIN I, et al. The empirical Canadian high arctic ionospheric model (E-CHAIM): NmF2 and hmF2[J]. Journal of geophysical research: space physics, 2017, 122(8): 9015-9031. DOI: 10.1002/2017JA024398
    [16]
    GOWTAM V S, TULASI R S T. An artificial neural network-based ionospheric model to predict NmF2 and hmF2 using long-term data set of FORMOSAT-3/COSMIC radio occultation observations: preliminary results[J]. Journal of geophysical research: space physics, 2017, 122(11): 11743-11755. DOI: 10.1002/2017JA024795
    [17]
    TULASI R S, SAI G V, ARKA M, et al. The improved two-dimensional artificial neural network-based ionospheric model (ANNIM)[J]. Journal of geophysical research: space physics, 2018, 123(7): 5807-5820. DOI: 10.1029/2018JA025559
    [18]
    LI W, HE C C, HU A D, et al. A new method for improving the performance of an ionospheric model developed by multi-instrument measurements based on artificial neural network[J]. Advances in space research, 2021, 67(1): 20-34. DOI: 10.1016/j.asr.2020.07.032
    [19]
    WANG R P, ZHOU C, DENG Z X, et al. Predicting foF2 in the China region using the neural networks improved by the genetic algorithm[J]. Journal of atmospheric and solar-terrestrial physics, 2013(92): 7-17. DOI: 10.1016/j.jastp.2012.09.010
    [20]
    宋锐. 中国区域电离层foF2建模及其应用研究[D]. 北京: 中国地震局地震预测研究所, 2018.
    [21]
    GOWTAM V S, THLASI R S, RENINISCH B, et al. A new artificial neural network-based global three-dimensional ionospheric model (ANNIM-3D) using long-term ionospheric observations: preliminary results[J]. Journal of geophysical research: space physics, 2019, 124(6): 4639-4657. DOI: 10.1029/2019JA026540
    [22]
    LI W, ZHAO D S, HE C Y, et al. Application of a multi-layer artificial neural network in a 3-D global electron density model using the long-term observations of COSMIC, Fengyun-3C, and digisonde[J]. Space weather, 2021, 19(3). DOI: 10.1029/2020sw002605
    [23]
    HABARULEMA J B, OKOH D, BURESOVA D, et al. A global 3-D electron density reconstruction model based on radio occultation data and neural networks[J]. Journal of atmospheric and solar-terrestrial physics. 2021, 221(1): 105702. DOI: 10.1016/j.jastp.2021.105702
    [24]
    YANG D, FANG H X. A low-latitude three-dimensional ionospheric electron density model based on radio occultation data using artificial neural networks with prior knowledge[J]. Space weather, 2023, 21(1). DOI: 10.1029/2022sw003299
    [25]
    HABARULEMA J B, OKOH D, BURESOVA D, et al. A storm-time global electron density reconstruction model in three-dimensions based on artificial neural networks[J]. Advances in space research, 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.asr.2024.02.014
    [26]
    ZHOU Y, LIU J, LI S H, et al. Ionospheric TEC prediction based on ensemble learning models[J]. Space weather, 2024, 22(3): e2023SW003790. DOI: 10.1029/2023SW003790
    [27]
    LINTY N, FARASIN A , FAVENZA A, et al. Detection of GNSS ionospheric scintillations based on machine learning decision tree[J]. IEEE transactions on aerospace and electronic systems, 2018, 55(1): 303-317. DOI: 10.1109/TAES.2018.2850385
    [28]
    YANG K F, CHU Y H, SU C L, et al. An examination of FORMOSAT-3/COSMIC ionospheric electron density profile: Data quality criteria and comparisons with the IRI model[J]. Terrestrial, atmospheric and oceanic sciences, 2009, 20(1): 193-206. DOI: 10.3319/TAO.2007.10.05.01(F3C
    [29]
    BREIMAN L. Random forests[J]. Machine learning, 2001(45): 5-32. DOI: 10.1023/A:1010933404324
    [30]
    WILLISCROFT L A, POOLE A W V. Neural networks, foF2, sunspot number and magnetic activity[J]. Geophysical research letters, 1996, 23(24): 3659-3662. DOI: 10.1029/96GL03472
    • Relative Articles
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(8)  / Tables(2)

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (28) PDF downloads(2) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    Copyright © 2009《 GNSS World of China 》 Editorial Office

    Address：84 Jianshe Dong Lu, Muye District, Xinxiang City, Henan Province, ChinaChina Pos：453000Tel：0373-3712411Fax：0373-3052232Email：qqdwxt@126.com

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd    

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return