GNSS World of China

Volume 49 Issue 1
Feb.  2024
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
HE Congcong, WANG Zhongyuan, ZHANG Tan. BDS observation data quality and dynamic PPP performance analysis[J]. GNSS World of China, 2024, 49(1): 120-126. doi: 10.12265/j.gnss.2023183
Citation: HE Congcong, WANG Zhongyuan, ZHANG Tan. BDS observation data quality and dynamic PPP performance analysis[J]. GNSS World of China, 2024, 49(1): 120-126. doi: 10.12265/j.gnss.2023183

BDS observation data quality and dynamic PPP performance analysis

doi: 10.12265/j.gnss.2023183
  • Received Date: 2023-09-19
  • Accepted Date: 2023-09-19
  • Available Online: 2024-01-05
  • In order to analyze the global data quality, dynamic precise point positioning (PPP) performance and performance differences of BeiDou Navigation Satellite System (BDS) in different regions, we select the observation data of a total of 9 Multi-GNSS Experiment (MGEX) continuous tracking stations in 3 different region, using GPS as a reference, and from the satellite visibility, pseudo-range multipath effect, data integrity rate and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), PPP positioning accuracy and other aspects to analyze the data quality and positioning accuracy of BDS in five aspects. The results show that the satellite visibility of BDS has regional differences, and the multipath effect and SNR ratio do not show regional characteristics. The data quality of BDS-3 is better than that of BDS-2, and the data quality of BDS at different frequency points is also significantly different. Difference, poor data quality at B1I frequency points. The dynamic positioning accuracy of BDS is slightly weaker than that of GPS, and multiple systems have a significant effect on improving positioning accuracy.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    杨元喜. 北斗卫星导航系统的进展、贡献与挑战[J]. 测绘学报, 2010, 39(1): 1-6.
    [2]
    陈忠贵, 武向军. 北斗三号卫星系统总体设计[J]. 南京航空航天大学学报, 2020, 52(6): 835-845.
    [3]
    DENG C L, QI S F, LI Y Y, et al. A comparative analysis of navigation signals in BDS-2 and BDS-3 using zero-baseline experiments[J]. GPS solutions, 2021, 25(4): 143. DOI: 10.1007/s10291-021-01178-z
    [4]
    李涌涛, 李建文, 潘林, 等. 北斗三号新信号B1C和B2a观测数据质量分析评估[J]. 地球科学进展, 2018, 33(11): 1161-1168.
    [5]
    YANG Y X, MAO Y, SUN B J. Basic performance and future developments of BeiDou Global Navigation Satellite System[J]. Satellite navigation, 2020, 1(1): 1-18. DOI: 10.1186/s43020-019-0006-0
    [6]
    LI M Y, HUANG G W, WANG L, et al. Performance of Multi-GNSS in the Asia-Pacific region: signal quality, broadcast ephemeris and precise point positioning (PPP)[J]. Remote sensing, 2022, 14(13): 3028. DOI: 10.3390/rs14133028
    [7]
    虞顺. BDS-3试验星/Galileo卫星观测数据质量评估方法与结果对比分析[D]. 武汉: 武汉大学, 2020.
    [8]
    何义磊. 多GNSS间系统偏差建模与预报方法研究[D]. 徐州: 中国矿业大学, 2019.

    何义磊. 多GNSS间系统偏差建模与预报方法研究[D]. 徐州: 中国矿业大学, 2019.
    [9]
    张小红, 李星星, 李盼. GNSS精密单点定位技术及应用进展[J]. 测绘学报, 2017, 46(10): 1399-1407.
    [10]
    张小红, 胡家欢, 任晓东. PPP/PPP-RTK新进展与北斗/GNSS PPP定位性能比较[J]. 测绘学报, 2020, 49(9): 1084-1100.
    [11]
    王进. GNSS多频精密单点定位及快速模糊度固定算法研究[D]. 西安: 长安大学, 2021.
    [12]
    万苏波. BDS/GPS组合精密单点定位关键技术研究[D]. 徐州: 中国矿业大学, 2019.
    [13]
    HU J H, ZHANG X H, LI P, et al. Multi-GNSS fractional cycle bias products generation for GNSS ambiguity-fixed PPP at Wuhan University[J]. GPS solutions, 2019, 24(1): 15. DOI: 10.1007/s10291-019-0929-9
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(6)  / Tables(3)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (199) PDF downloads(34) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return