GNSS World of China

Volume 48 Issue 2
Apr.  2023
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
TAO Zhenqiang, CHEN Jian, ZHAO Xingwang, LIU Chao, LIU Chunyang. Positioning performance analysis of single epoch RTK with Beidou-3 new frequency point (B1C/B2a)[J]. GNSS World of China, 2023, 48(2): 43-52. doi: 10.12265/j.gnss.2022195
Citation: TAO Zhenqiang, CHEN Jian, ZHAO Xingwang, LIU Chao, LIU Chunyang. Positioning performance analysis of single epoch RTK with Beidou-3 new frequency point (B1C/B2a)[J]. GNSS World of China, 2023, 48(2): 43-52. doi: 10.12265/j.gnss.2022195

Positioning performance analysis of single epoch RTK with Beidou-3 new frequency point (B1C/B2a)

doi: 10.12265/j.gnss.2022195
  • Received Date: 2022-10-28
  • Accepted Date: 2022-10-28
  • Available Online: 2023-04-24
  • The design of new frequency points (B1C/B2a) for BDS-3 effectively increases the diversity of multi-frequency combination positioning as well as improves the positioning performance of the BDS system. To systematically evaluate the RTK positioning performance of the new frequency point for BDS-3, 6 MGEX tracking stations were selected to form three baselines. Five single-frequency schemes of BDS-3 B1I/B3I/B1C/B2a/B2b, five dual-frequency uncombined schemes of BDS-2 B1I+B2I, BDS-2 B1I+B3I, BDS-3 B1C+B2a, BDS-3 B1I+B3I, BDS-2/BDS-3 B1I+B3I and a five-frequency uncombined scheme of BDS-3 B1I+B3I+B1C+B2a+B2b were designed for real-title kinematic(RTK) solving tests. When the baseline length does not exceed 25 km, the test results show that, in static mode, in east (E), north (N) and up (U) directions, the single-frequency positioning accuracy of BDS-3 new frequency point B1C/B2a is better than 2.85 cm, 1.67 cm and 4.02 cm respectively, and the dual-frequency positioning accuracy is better than 1.63 cm, 1.33 cm and 3.26 cm respectively, and the five-frequency positioning accuracy is better than 2.04 cm, 1.12 cm and 3.17 cm respectively; in kinematic mode, in E, N and U directions, the single-frequency positioning accuracy is better than 3.03 cm, 1.45 cm and 6.49 cm respectively, and the dual-frequency positioning accuracy is better than 1.92 cm, 0.95 cm and 6.71 cm respectively, and the five-frequency positioning accuracy is better than 2.32 cm, 0.91 cm and 4.89 cm respectively. The dual frequency positioning accuracy of BDS-3 new frequency point B1C+B2a and old frequency point B1I+B3I are compared in both modes, and are both better than that of the the BDS-2 B1I+B2I and B1I+B3I dual frequency. In addition, the positioning accuracy and stability of BDS-3 five-frequency uncombined scheme are better than single-frequency and dual-frequency uncombined schemes.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    杨元喜, 李金龙, 王爱兵, 等. 北斗区域卫星导航系统基本导航定位性能初步评估[J]. 中国科学:地球科学, 2014, 44(1): 72-81.
    [2]
    YANG Y, LIU L, LI J, et al. Featured services and performance of BDS-3[J]. Science bulletin, 2021, 66(20): 2135-2143. DOI: 10.1016/j.scib.2021.06.013
    [3]
    郑爽, 王世杰. 北斗三号短基线相对定位精度分析[J]. 全球定位系统, 2020, 45(1): 61-65. DOI: 10.13442/j.gnss.1008-9268.2020.01.010
    [4]
    MI X L, ZHANG B C, YUAN Y B, et al. Characteristics of GPS, BDS2, BDS3 and Galileo inter-system biases and their influence on RTK positioning[J]. Measurement science and technology, 2019, 31(1): 015009. DOI: 10.1088/1361-6501/ab4209
    [5]
    杨元喜, 许扬胤, 李金龙, 等. 北斗三号系统进展及性能预测——试验验证数据分析[J]. 中国科学:地球科学, 2018, 48(5): 584-594.
    [6]
    王楚扬, 秘金钟, 李勇熹, 等. BDS-3/GPS/Galileo组合动态差分定位算法研究[J]. 测绘科学, 2022, 47(2): 16-22. DOI: 10.16251/j.cnki.1009-2307.2022.02.003
    [7]
    曹多明, 成英燕, 常春涛, 等. BDS不同卫星选择对相对定位精度的影响研究[J]. 测绘科学, 2022, 47(1): 15-23. DOI: 10.16251/j.cnki.1009-2307.2022.01.003
    [8]
    梁玉可, 党亚民, 杨强, 等. BDS不同星座组合对亚太地区相对定位的影响[J]. 测绘科学, 2022, 47(1): 33-39. DOI: 10.16251/j.cnki.1009-2307.2022.01.005
    [9]
    彭广民. BDS-2/BDS-3短基线相对定位精度分析[J]. 地矿测绘, 2021, 37(1): 8-12. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-9394.2021.01.003
    [10]
    罗杰. 不同截止高度角下BDS-2/BDS-3短基线RTK定位性能分析[J]. 地理空间信息, 2021, 19(11): 44-47. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-4623.2021.11.012
    [11]
    刘洋洋, 杨颖, 孙张振, 等. 解算策略对BDS-3新信号双频RTK定位性能的影响[C]//第十三届中国卫星导航年会, 2022: 180-185.
    [12]
    朱松, 李玮. BDS-3卫星信号质量及RTK定位分析[J]. 测绘科学, 2022, 47(1): 1-8. DOI: 10.16251/j.cnki.1009-2307.2022.01.001
    [13]
    糜晓龙, 袁运斌, 张宝成. BDS-3和Galileo 组合的RTK定位性能分析[J/OL]. (2021-10-29)[2022-07-12]. 武汉大学学报(信息科学版). http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/42.1676.TN.20211029.1234.004.html
    [14]
    戴金倩, 吴迪, 戴小蕾, 等. BDS-3实时精密单点定位精度分析[J]. 测绘通报, 2020(1): 30-34. DOI: 10.13474/j.cnki.11-2246.2020.0007
    [15]
    李毓照, 闫浩文, 王世杰, 等. BDS三频信号最优组合的模糊聚类分析法[J]. 测绘学报, 2020, 49(8): 974-982. DOI: 10.11947/j.AGCS.2020.20190432
    [16]
    边少锋, 刘一, 纪兵, 等. 北斗三号卫星观测信息高度角相关随机模型统计特性分析[J]. 武汉大学学报(信息科学版), 2022, 47(10): 1615-1624.
    [17]
    吴云, 刘万科. 最优估计基础[M]. 武汉: 武汉大学出版社, 2021: 128-133.
    [18]
    TEUNISSEN P J G. A canonical theory for short GPS baselines part I: the baseline precision[J]. Journal of geodesy, 1997, 71(6): 320-336. DOI: 10.1007/s001900050100
    [19]
    TEUNISSEN P J G. The least-square ambiguity decorrelation adjustment: a method for fast GPS ambiguity estimation[J]. Journal of geodesy, 1995, 70(1): 65-82. DOI: 10.1007/BF00863419
    [20]
    陈文涛, 程鹏飞, 徐彦田, 等. 单差模糊度的BDS/GLONASS多频RTK算法[J]. 测绘科学, 2020, 45(4): 7-12. DOI: 10.16251/j.cnki.1009-2307.2020.04.002
    [21]
    VERHAGEN S, TEUNISSEN P J G. The ratio test for future GNSS ambiguity resolution[J]. GPS solutions, 2013, 17(4): 535-548. DOI: 10.1007/s10291-012-0299-z
    [22]
    李涌涛, 李建文, 潘林, 等. 北斗三号新信号B1C和B2a观测数据质量分析评估[J]. 地球科学进展, 2018(11): 1161-1168. DOI: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2018.11.1161.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(16)  / Tables(9)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (523) PDF downloads(47) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return