GNSS World of China

Volume 47 Issue 5
Nov.  2022
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Article Navigation >  GNSS World of China  > 2022  >  47(5): 22-27
LIU Yongzheng, CAI Changsheng, CUI Xianqiang, ZHU Yongxing. BDS-3 dynamic data characteristics for new signals of B1C/B2a and PPP accuracy analysis[J]. GNSS World of China, 2022, 47(5): 22-27. doi: 10.12265/j.gnss.2022064
Citation: LIU Yongzheng, CAI Changsheng, CUI Xianqiang, ZHU Yongxing. BDS-3 dynamic data characteristics for new signals of B1C/B2a and PPP accuracy analysis[J]. GNSS World of China, 2022, 47(5): 22-27. doi: 10.12265/j.gnss.2022064
shu

BDS-3 dynamic data characteristics for new signals of B1C/B2a and PPP accuracy analysis

doi: 10.12265/j.gnss.2022064
  • 1.

    School of Geoscience and Info-Physics, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China

  • 2.

    State Key Laboratory of Geo-Information Engineering, Xi’an 710054, China

  • Received Date: 2022-04-14
  • Accepted Date: 2022-07-28
    • Available Online: 2022-09-26
    Abstract
  • The vehicle dynamic data characteristics for BDS-3 new signals of B1C/B2a are analyzed using four indices, i.e. carrier noise ratio (CNR), data integrity rate, observation noise and multipath. The kinematic precise point positioning (PPP) performance for BDS-3 new signals is also tested and compared with the other GNSS. The test results show that the average CNR of BDS-3 B2a new frequency is better than those of the other BDS frequencies, but slightly worse than that of GPS L5. The data integrity rate of BDS is relatively higher compared with the other GNSS. Further, the data integrity rate of the BDS-3 B2a new frequency is the highest. The noise of BDS-3 pseudorange observation at B2b frequency is the lowest, and the pseudorange observation noise at B1C and B2a frequencies is about three times of that of the B2b signal. However, the noise of phase observations at different frequencies is in the same level. For pseudorange multipath, the BDS-3 B1C/B2a signal is slightly smaller than the B2b signal, and overall, the GPS L5 signal has the strongest ability to suppress the multipath. In terms of kinematic PPP performance, the BDS-3 B1C/B2a dual-frequency combined kinematic PPP achieves the best positioning accuracy with a three-dimensional root mean square error of 0.439 m. Compared with the BDS B1I/B3I, GPS L1/L2, GLONASS G1/G2, and Galileo E1/E5a dual-frequency combined PPP, the accuracy improvement rates are 49%、56%、81% and 42% respectively.

     

    • FullText(HTML)
  • loading
    • References(14)
  • [1]
    郭树人, 蔡洪亮, 孟轶男, 等. 北斗三号导航定位技术体制与服务性能[J]. 测绘学报, 2019, 48(7): 810-821.
    [2]
    中国卫星导航系统管理办公室. 北斗卫星导航系统空间信号接口控制文件: 公开服务信号B2A (1.0 版): BDS-SIS- ICD-B2A-1.0[S]. 北京: 中国卫星导航系统管理办公室, 2017.
    [3]
    中国卫星导航系统管理办公室. 北斗卫星导航系统空间信号接口控制文件: 公开服务信号B1C ( 1.0 版): BDS-SIS- ICD-B1C-1.0[S]. 北京: 中国卫星导航系统管理办公室, 2017.
    [4]
    伊珣, 徐爱功, 唐龙江. 利用Anubis检核BDS观测数据质量[J]. 导航定位学报, 2021, 9(5): 134-141,162. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-4999.2021.05.019
    [5]
    ZHANG Z T, LI B F, NIE L W, et al. Initial assessment of BeiDou-3 Global Navigation Satellite System: signal quality, RTK and PPP[J]. GPS solutions, 2019, 23(4): 1-12. DOI: 10.1007/s10291-019-0905-4
    [6]
    HUANG C, SONG S L, CHENG Q M, et al. Preliminary analysis of BDS-3 data based on iGMAS[J]. Chinese astronomy and astrophysics, 2019, 43(3): 390-404. DOI: 10.1016/j.chinastron.2019.01.001
    [7]
    贺延伟, 贾小林, 刘家龙, 等. BDS-3与BDS-2基本服务性能对比分析[J]. 导航定位学报, 2022, 10(1): 20-28,75. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-4999.2022.01.003
    [8]
    ZHU Y X, ZHENG K, CUI X Q, et al. Preliminary analysis of the quality and positioning performance of BDS-3 global interoperable signal B1C&B2a[J]. Advances in space research, 2021, 67(8): 2483-2490. DOI: 10.1016/j.asr.2021.01.045
    [9]
    慕仁海, 党亚民, 许长辉. BDS-3新频点单点定位研究[J]. 测绘通报, 2021(3): 12-17. DOI: 10.13474/j.cnki.11-2246.2021.0070
    [10]
    谷世铭. BDS-3精密单点定位模型优化及偏差处理[D]. 青岛: 山东科技大学, 2020.
    [11]
    李树文, 王潜心, 龚佑兴. 北斗三号卫星新信号数据质量分析[J]. 合肥工业大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 44(8): 1111-1117.
    [12]
    刘万科, 史翔, 朱锋, 等. 谷歌NEXUS 9智能终端原始GNSS观测值的质量分析[J]. 武汉大学学报(信息科学版), 2019, 44(12): 1749-1756.
    [13]
    ZHANG X H, WU M K, LIU W K, et al. Initial assessment of the COMPASS/BeiDou-3: new-generation navigation signals[J]. Journal of geodesy, 2017, 91(10): 1225-1240. DOI: 10.1007/s00190-017-1020-3
    [14]
    CAI C S, GAO Y, PAN L, et al. Precise point positioning with quad-constellations: GPS, BeiDou, GLONASS and Galileo[J]. Advances in space research, 2015, 56(1): 133-143. DOI: 10.1016/J.ASR.2015.04.001
    • Relative Articles
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(6)  / Tables(3)

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (297) PDF downloads(60) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    Copyright © 2009《 GNSS World of China 》 Editorial Office

    Address：84 Jianshe Dong Lu, Muye District, Xinxiang City, Henan Province, ChinaChina Pos：453000Tel：0373-3712411Fax：0373-3052232Email：qqdwxt@126.com

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd    

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return