GNSS World of China

Volume 48 Issue 1
Feb.  2023
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
WU Feiyang, LI Xin. Estimation and characteristics analysis of BDS-3 uncalibrated phase delay based on different PPP models[J]. GNSS World of China, 2023, 48(1): 14-23. doi: 10.12265/j.gnss.2022053
Citation: WU Feiyang, LI Xin. Estimation and characteristics analysis of BDS-3 uncalibrated phase delay based on different PPP models[J]. GNSS World of China, 2023, 48(1): 14-23. doi: 10.12265/j.gnss.2022053

Estimation and characteristics analysis of BDS-3 uncalibrated phase delay based on different PPP models

doi: 10.12265/j.gnss.2022053
  • Received Date: 2022-04-01
    Available Online: 2023-02-07
  • Accurate estimation of uncalibrated phase delay (UPD) is an important precondition for ambiguity resolution of precise point positioning (PPP). The commonly used PPP models are mainly divided into the ionosphere-free (IF) combination model and the undifferenced and uncombined model, and the UPD estimation methods used for the two models are different. In this paper, the consistency of UPD estimation based on IF combination model and uncombined model is proved theoretically under the premise of using the same processing strategy. Furthermore, the UPD products of BDS-3 were estimated by using the observation data of 45 International GNSS Service (IGS) stations uniformly distributed around the world, and the time stability and consistency of UPD products obtained by the two estimation models were analyzed. The results show that the UPD of wide-lane and narrow-lane in BDS-3 maintain high stability. The average standard deviation of UPD of wide-lane in ten days is 0.0607, and that of narrow-lane in one day is 0.059 9. For BDS-2 satellites, the UPD results estimated by the two models are highly consistent. However, the UPD results of BDS-3 satellites are related to the characteristics of satellite orbit types and manufacturers. There is a significant difference in UPD between different orbit types and manufacturers of about 0.5 weeks, but there is consistency among BDS satellites of the same orbit type and manufacturer. It can be concluded that the hardware delay of the receiver corresponding to satellites produced by different orbital types and different manufacturers of BDS-3 has a systematic deviation. The estimation of inter-satellite-type bias in PPP further demonstrates this conclusion. Finally, the impact of these biased on PPP and PPP AR was carefully discussed.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    杨元喜. 北斗卫星导航系统的进展、贡献与挑战[J]. 测绘学报, 2010, 39(1): 1-6.
    [2]
    GE M, GENDT G, ROTHACHER M, et al. Resolution of GPS carrier-phase ambiguities in precise point positioning (PPP) with daily observations[J]. Journal of geodesy, 2008, 82(7): 389-399. DOI: 10.1007/s00190-007-0187-4
    [3]
    李星星, 张小红, 李盼. 固定非差整数模糊度的PPP快速精密定位定轨[J]. 地球物理学报, 2012, 55(3): 833-840. DOI: 10.6038/j.issn.0001-5733.2012.03.013
    [4]
    宋保丰, 郝金明, 师一帅, 等. 非差FCB估计及其在PPP模糊度固定中的应用[J]. 全球定位系统, 2019, 44(3): 33-37. DOI: 10.13442/j.gnss.1008-9268.2019.03.005
    [5]
    KOUBA J, HEROUS P. Precise point positioning using IGS orbit and clock products[J]. GPS solutions, 2001, 5(2): 12-28. DOI: 10.1007/PL00012883
    [6]
    郝明, 王庆良, 崔笃信. GPS精密单点定位快速收敛方法研究[J]. 大地测量与地球动力学, 2009, 29(2): 88-91. DOI: 10.14075/j.jgg.2009.02.009
    [7]
    ABDEL-SALAM M, GAO Y. Precise GPS atmosphere sensing based on un-differenced observations[C]//Proceedings of the 17th International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of the Institute of Navigation, 2004.
    [8]
    CAO X Y, SHEN F, ZHANG S J, et al. Satellite availability and positioning performance of uncombined precise point positioning using BeiDou-2 and BeiDou-3 multi-frequency signals[J]. Advances in space research, 2021, 67(4): 1303-1316. DOI: 10.1016/j.asr.2020.11.011
    [9]
    辜声峰. 多频GNSS非差非组合精密数据处理理论及其应用[D]. 武汉: 武汉大学, 2013.
    [10]
    周峰. 多系统GNSS非差非组合精密单点定位相关理论和方法研究[D]. 上海: 华东师范大学, 2018.
    [11]
    李星星. GNSS 精密单点定位及非差模糊度快速确定方法研究[D]. 武汉: 武汉大学, 2013.
    [12]
    WÜBBENA G. Software developments for geodetic positioning with GPS using TI-4100 code and carrier measurements[C]//Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Precise Positioning with the Global Positioning System, 1985.
    [13]
    MELBOURNE W G. The case for ranging in GPS based geodetic systems[C]// Proceedings of First International Symposium on Precise Positioning with the Global Positing System, 1985: 373-386.
    [14]
    张且且, 赵龙, 周建华. 基于无电离层组合/非差非组合混合观测模型的精密单点定位[C]//第十一届中国卫星导航年会, 2020.
    [15]
    WANG J, HUANG G W, YANG Y X, et al. FCB estimation with three diferent PPP models: equivalence analysis and experiment tests[J]. GPS solutions, 2019, 23(4): 93. DOI: 10.1007/s10291-019-0887-2
    [16]
    李昕. 多频率多星座 GNSS 快速精密定位关键技术研究[D]. 武汉: 武汉大学, 2021.
    [17]
    李昕. Multi-GNSS精密单点定位固定解方法与性能评估[D]. 武汉: 武汉大学, 2018.
    [18]
    刘格格. 多频率多星座GNSS相位偏差估计与非差模糊度快速固定[D]. 武汉: 武汉大学, 2021.
    [19]
    李浩东, 赵齐乐, 陶钧, 等. 北斗三号卫星 FCB 估计及其模糊度固定 [J/OL]. (2022-02-18)[2022-03-03]. 武汉大学学报(信息科学版). https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/42.1676.TN.202218.1028.002.html
    [20]
    李昕, 袁勇强, 张柯柯, 等. 联合GEO/IGSO/MEO的北斗PPP模糊度固定方法与试验分析[J]. 测绘学报, 2018, 47(3): 324-331. DOI: 10.11947/j.AGCS.2018.20170341
    [21]
    张小红, 李盼, 李星星, 等. 宽巷载波相位模糊度小数偏差时变特性分析[J]. 测绘学报, 2013, 42(6): 798-803.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(8)  / Tables(1)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (291) PDF downloads(79) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return