GNSS World of China

Volume 47 Issue 4
Sep.  2022
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
JING Xin, CHE Tongyu, ZHOU Shuhan, LI Jianwen. Comparative analysis of broadcast ephemeris accuracy before and after the opening of BDS-3 system[J]. GNSS World of China, 2022, 47(4): 23-30. doi: 10.12265/j.gnss.2022051
Citation: JING Xin, CHE Tongyu, ZHOU Shuhan, LI Jianwen. Comparative analysis of broadcast ephemeris accuracy before and after the opening of BDS-3 system[J]. GNSS World of China, 2022, 47(4): 23-30. doi: 10.12265/j.gnss.2022051

Comparative analysis of broadcast ephemeris accuracy before and after the opening of BDS-3 system

doi: 10.12265/j.gnss.2022051
  • Received Date: 2022-03-30
    Available Online: 2022-07-20
  • BeiDou-3 Navigation Satellite System (BDS-3) has been in operation for more than one year. By studying the BeiDou Navigation Satellite System (BDS) broadcast ephemeris data from August 2019 to August 2021, the orbit, clock error and signal-inspace ranging error (SISRE) of BeiDou Navigation Satellite (regional) System (BDS-2) and BDS-3 satellites are analyzed by using the post precision ephemeris. The results show that after the BDS-3 system is opened, the satellite orbit accuracy is significantly higher than that of BDS-2. The radial error root mean square (RMS) value is improved from about 0.87 m to better than 0.23 m, the accuracy is improved by about 74%, and the 3D error RMS value is improved from less than 1.63 m to better than 0.75 m, the accuracy is improved by about 54%; The accuracy of hydrogen atomic clock and rubidium atomic clock is the same. The accuracy improvement of RMS value of BDS-3 clock error is basically the same as that of BDS-2, with an accuracy improvement of about 1 ns; In SISRE accuracy comparison, the RMS value of BDS-2 SISRE is increased from 0.9 m to 0.7 m, and BDS-3 SISRE is increased from 0.8 m to 0.5 m. through comprehensive comparison, the performance of BDS-3 system is greatly improved

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    周锋, 徐天河. GPS/BDS/Galileo三频精密单点定位模型及性能分析[J]. 测绘学报, 2021, 50(1): 61-70. DOI: 10.11947/j.AGCS.2021.20200146
    [2]
    肖健, 史俊波, 欧阳晨皓, 等. 2019-2020年北斗三号广播星历长期性能分析[C]//第十二届中国卫星导航年会, 2021: 7.
    [3]
    王海春, 贾小林, 李鼎, 等. 北斗三号卫星广播星历精度评估分析[J]. 导航定位学报, 2019, 7(4): 60-63,74. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-4999.2019.04.011
    [4]
    路晓峰. 导航卫星钟差评估与预报研究[D]. 西安: 长安大学, 2007.
    [5]
    杨建华, 唐成盼, 宋叶志, 等. GNSS导航电文空间信号测距误差分析[J]. 中国科学:物理学、力学、天文学, 2021, 51(1): 68-80.
    [6]
    MONTENBRUCK O, STEIGENBERGER P, HAUSCHILD A. Broadcast versus precise ephemerides: a multi-GNSS perspective[J]. GPS solutions, 2015, 19(2): 321-333. DOI: 10.1007/s10291-014-0390-8
    [7]
    罗璠, 李建文, 黄海, 等. BDS广播星历的轨道误差分析[C]//中国卫星导航学术年会, 2014.
    [8]
    曾琪, 吴多, 刘万科. 基于长期数据的北斗广播星历精度评估[J]. 大地测量与地球动力学, 2016, 36(11): 958-962. DOI: 10.14075/j.jgg.2016.11.004
    [9]
    冯来平, 毛悦, 宋小勇, 等. 低轨卫星与星间链路增强的北斗卫星联合定轨精度分析[J]. 测绘学报, 2016, 45(z2): 109-115.
    [10]
    WU W, GUO, F, ZHENG J Z. Analysis of Galileo signal-in-space range error and positioning performance during 2015–2018[J]. Satellite navigation, 2020, 1(1): 6. DOI: 10.1186/s43020-019-0005-1
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(7)  / Tables(4)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (588) PDF downloads(74) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return