GNSS World of China

Volume 47 Issue 1
Mar.  2022
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
TENG Yuehao, JIA Xiaolin, LEI Panrong, ZHOU Ping, CAO Chuang. iGMAS multi-brand monitoring receiver data quality analysis[J]. GNSS World of China, 2022, 47(1): 59-67. doi: 10.12265/j.gnss.2021083104
Citation: TENG Yuehao, JIA Xiaolin, LEI Panrong, ZHOU Ping, CAO Chuang. iGMAS multi-brand monitoring receiver data quality analysis[J]. GNSS World of China, 2022, 47(1): 59-67. doi: 10.12265/j.gnss.2021083104

iGMAS multi-brand monitoring receiver data quality analysis

doi: 10.12265/j.gnss.2021083104
  • Received Date: 2021-08-31
    Available Online: 2022-02-23
  • In order to verify the development status of GNSS receiver, fully confirm the receiver performance of the international GNSS monitoring and assessment system (iGMAS) monitoring station, and make contributions to the subsequent Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) receiver data quality assessment. Based on iGMAS multi-brand receiver comparative measurement experiment, the receiver performance and the quality of observation data were evaluated comprehensively by statistical analysis of the observation data quality (integrity rate, multipath, cycle jump ratio, observation noise) and the relative positioning accuracy of zero base line at different frequency points of multi-brand monitoring receivers. The results show that the data quality and performance of iGMAS monitoring station meet the corresponding standards. In terms of data integrity rate and multipath, the domestic brand receiver is basically equivalent to the foreign horizontal receiver. In terms of cycle jump ratio, pseudo-range, carrier phase noise and relative positioning accuracy of null base line, the domestic monitoring receiver is obviously better than the foreign monitoring receiver.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    王然. 时间实验室IGMAS接收机时延稳定性分析与校准[D]. 北京: 中国科学院大学, 2019.
    [2]
    苏行. iGMAS监测接收机数据质量分析方法及软件设计[D]. 北京: 中国科学院大学, 2014.
    [3]
    陈忠贵, 武向军. 北斗三号卫星系统总体设计[J]. 南京航空航天大学学报, 2020, 52(6): 835-845.
    [4]
    陈佳清. 利用TEQC及RTKLIB软件分析GPS数据质量[J]. 导航定位学报, 2016, 4(1): 126-130.
    [5]
    高余婷. BDS三频观测数据综合质量评估方法研究[D]. 西安: 长安大学, 2017.
    [6]
    戴凯阳, 李保东, 张键. 北斗三号新体制信号数据质量分析与接收机性能评估[J]. 现代导航, 2020, 11(2): 105-108. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7976.2020.02.005
    [7]
    郭强, 杨开伟, 杜聪慧, 等. 高精度接收机数据质量评估方法与验证[C]//第五届中国卫星导航学术年会, 南京, 2014.
    [8]
    ZHANG X H, WU M K, LIU W K, et al. Initial assessment of the COMPASS/BeiDou-3: new-generation navigation signals[J]. Journal of geodesy, 2017, 91(10): 1225-1240. DOI: 10.1007/s00190-017-1020-3
    [9]
    刘明亮. 北斗数据质量及定位精度分析[D]. 北京: 北京建筑大学, 2019.
    [10]
    夏思琦, 于先文, 齐晨. 三种常用周跳探测与修复方法的性能分析[J]. 全球定位系统, 2020, 45(5): 1-5,13.
    [11]
    董斌斌, 陈国恒, 聂庆森. 基于G-nut/Anubis的GNSS多系统数据质量分析研究[J]. 全球定位系统, 2020, 45(3): 28-32,36.
    [12]
    LEICK A, RAPOPORT L, TATARNIKOV D. GPS satellite surveying: fourth edition[M]. GPS Satellite Surveying, Fourth Edition, Wiley, 2015. DOI: 10.1002/9781119018612
    [13]
    全球连续监测评估系统(iGMAS)质量要求 第1部分 观测数据: GB/T 39396. 1-2020[S]. 北京: 国家市场监督管理总局国家标准化管理委员会, 2020.
    [14]
    黄超, 宋淑丽, 陈钦明, 等. 基于iGMAS的北斗三号组网星数据初步分析[J]. 天文学报, 2019, 60(2): 50-61.
    [15]
    高晓, 戴吾蛟, 李施佳. 高精度GPS/BDS兼容接收机内部噪声检测方法研究[J]. 武汉大学学报(信息科学版), 2015, 40(6): 795-799.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(6)  / Tables(5)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (419) PDF downloads(37) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return