Accuracy analysis of high-precision GNSS solution results for different precise ephemeris
-
摘要: 进行震时高频全球卫星导航系统（GNSS）数据解算时,不同的精密星历对GNSS解算结果会有不同的影响．本文针对IGS数据中心提供的最终精密星历(IGF)和快速精密星历(IGR)在震时高频GNSS数据解算结果中的精度进行分析,从理论上探讨不同星历对震时高频GNSS数据精度的影响,选取2010年Baja地震的高频GNSS数据采用GAMIT／TARACK单历元动态定位方法进行解算分析,结果表明,两种星历对震时高频GNSS数据结果相差不大, 在E、N方向上差值最大不超过2.2 cm,在U方向上差值最大不超过4 cm,且两种星历E、N、U方向均方根偏差小于2,解算震时高频GNSS数据时不同精密星历对解算结果精度影响差别在厘米级,当进行震时高频GNSS数据处理工作时,可使用不同精密星历进行替代解算．Abstract: When performing highfrequency GNSS data calculations during earthquakes, different precise ephemeris will have different effects on the GNSS solution results. This paper analyzes the accuracy of the final precision ephemeris (IGF) and fast precision ephemeris (IGR) provided by the IGS data center in the high-frequency GNSS data calculation results of the earthquake, and theoretically discusses the different ephemeris to the high frequency of the earthquake. The influence of GNSS data accuracy is selected. The high-frequency GNSS data of the Baja earthquake in 2010 is analyzed by GAMIT／TARACK single epoch dynamic positioning method. The results show that the two ephemeris have little difference with the high-frequency GNSS data during the earthquake. The difference between the E and N directions is no more than 2.2 cm, the difference in the U direction is not more than 4 cm, and the root mean square deviation of the E, N, and U directions of the two ephemeris is less than 2. The results show that the difference between the precision of the precise ephemeris and the accuracy of the solution results in the high-frequency GNSS data is in the centimeter level. When the high-frequency GNSS data processing work is performed, different precision ephemeris can be used for the alternative solution.
-
Key words:
- earthquake /
- high frequency GNSS /
- data solution /
- GAMIT／TRACK /
- different precision ephemeris /
- dynamic positioning
-
[1] LARSON K M，BILICH A，AXELRAD P. Improving the precision of high-rate GPS［J］. Journal of Geophysical Research，2007，112（B5）: 422.DOI: 10.1029/2006JB004367. [2] BILICH A, CASSIDY J F, LARSON K M. GPS seismology:Application to the 2002 Mw 7. 9 denali fault earthquake［J］. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 2008, 98(2):593-606.DOI: 10.1785/0120070096. [3] EMORE G L, HAASE J S, CHOI K, et al. Recovering seismic displacements through combined use of 1Hz GPS and strong-motion accelerometers ［J］Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America,2007,97(2):357-378.DOI: 10.1785/0120060153. [4] LIU J N, GE M R. PANDA software and its preliminary result of positioning and orbit determination［J］. Wuhan University Journal of Natural Science, 2003,8(2B):603-609.DOI: 1007-1202(2003)02B-0603-07. [5] 赵齐乐,刘经南,葛茂荣,等.用PANDA 对GPS 和CHAMP 卫星精密定轨［J］.大地测量与地球动力学,2005,25(2):312-315. [6] 耿涛,赵齐乐,刘经商,等.基于PANDA 软件的实时精密单点定位研究［J］. 武汉大学学报(信息科学版),2007,32(4):312-315. [7] ZUMBERGE J F,HEFLIN M B,JEFFERSON D C,et a1.Precise point positioning for the efficient and robust analysis of GPS data from large networks［J］.Journal of Geophysical Research:Solid Earth,1997,102(B3):5005-5017.DOI: 10.1029/96jb03860. [8] 李征航,黄劲松.GPS测量与数据处理［M］.武汉:武汉大学出版社,2005. [9] 蒲崛茜.精密单点定位相关技术问题研究［D］.成都:西南交通大学,2012. [10] 魏子卿,葛茂荣.GPS相对定位的数学模型［M］.北京:测绘出版社,1998. [11] 刘经南,刘焱雄. GPS卫星定位技术进展［J］. 全球定位系统, 2000,25(2):1-7. [12] KING R W, BOCK Y. Documentation for the GAMIT[JP] GPS analysis softwate ［M］.Mass. Inst. of Tech., Scripps Inst.Occeangr.,2003,Release10. 1 [13] LARSON K M, BILICH A, AXELRAD P. Improving the precision of high-rate GPS［J］. Journal of Geophysical Research, 2007,112(B5):422-433.DOI: 10.1029/2006JB004367. [14] 潘宇明, 丁乐乐, 孟凡效, 等. GNSS多系统动态精密单点定位性能分析［J］. 全球定位系统, 2018, 43(2):12-19. [15] 方荣新.高采样率GPS数据非差精密处理方法及其在地震学中的应用研究［D］.武汉:武汉大学,2010. -
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 277
- HTML全文浏览量: 32
- PDF下载量: 84
- 被引次数: 0
下载:
