Optimization of GNSS data processing methods in Yunnan and surrounding areas
-
摘要: 采用麻省理工学院开发的GAMIT/GLOBK软件,将2015年-2016年全球347个IGS站观测数据分七个子网解算,得到一个固定的参考框架来解算云南及周边地区的35个全球卫星导航系统(GNSS)基准站的坐标,测站坐标均方根误差水平方向在0.7 mm以内,垂直方向在0.3 mm以内,水平方向的坐标重复性精度在5 mm以内,垂向坐标的重复性精度大多数在2.5 cm以内;与在ITRF2014下解算的测站坐标、基线长度、水平速度场结果对比表明:测站坐标存在系统误差,水平方向上的差异在8.5 mm以内,垂直方向上在3 cm以内;基线长度差异在2 mm以内,水平速度场在数值上存在毫米级的差异,方向上基本一致.Abstract: The observation data of 347 global IGS stations from 2015 to 2016 are divided into seven subnets for calculation,with using GAMIT/GLOBK software developed by the Massachusetts institute of technology, and a fixed frame of reference is obtained to calculate the coordinates of 35 GNSS reference stations of Yunnan and surrounding areas.The horizontal direction and vertical direction of the RMS of the measuring station are within 0.7 mm and 0.3 mm,The horizontal coordinate repeatability accuracy is within 5 mm, while the vertical coordinate repeatability accuracy is mostly within 2.5 cm,The comparison with the measured station coordinates, baseline length and horizontal velocity field calculated under ITRF2014 shows that there is systematic error in the station coordinates, the difference in the horizontal direction is less than 8.5 mm, and the difference in the vertical direction is less than 3 cm,the baseline length difference is within 2 mm, and the horizontal velocity field has a difference of millimeter in value, and the direction is basically the same.
-
Key words:
- GNSS /
- ITRF2014 /
- data processing /
- difference
-
[1] 姜卫平,周晓慧,刘经南,等. 青藏高原地壳运动与应变的GPS监测研究[J]. 测绘学报,2008,37(3):285-292. [2] 洪敏,邵德盛,王伶俐.基于GNSS观测资料研究云南地壳形变与地震的关系[J].地震研究,2013,36(3):292-298. [3] 王伶俐,邵德盛,洪敏.云南境内陆态网络GNSS观测资料数据处理与初步结果[J].震灾防御技术,2015,10(1):141-150. [4] BACHMANN S, THALLER D,ROGGENBUCK O, et al. IVS contribution to ITRF2014[J]. Journal of Geodesy,2016,90(7):631-654.DOI:10.1007/s00190-016-0899-4.
[5 ] CHUJKOVA N A,MAXIMOVA T G,CHESNOKOVA T S,et al.Earth crust vertical movementsaccording to ITRF2000, ITRF2005,ITRF2008 and ITRF2014 coordinate systems and their comparing analysis[J].Geodesy and Geodynamics,2018,9(2):109-114.DOI:10.1016/J.GEOG.2017.07.007.[5] ALTAMIMI Z, REBLSCHUNGL P, METIVIER L,et al. ITRF2014: A new release of the international terrestrial reference frame mod-eling non-linear station motions[J].Journal of Geophysical Research:Solid Earth,2016,121(8):6109-6131. DOI: 10.1002/2016JB013098. [6] 占伟,杨博,武艳强,等.ITRF2000与ITRF2005的差异对GNSS数据处理的影响[J].大地测量与地球动力学,2011,31(6):109-112. [7] 杨文锋.不同ITRF框架下对GNSS数据处理的结果分析[J].测绘通报,2015(S1):91-95. [8] 张双成,曹海洋,高涵,等.基于GAMIT的GPS短基线解类型分析及应用[J].测绘通报,2011(10):27-29. [9] 肖玉钢,刘鸿飞,王峥.GNSS网参数估计中基准定义方法研究[J].大地测量与地球动力学,2012,32(4):79-82. [10] 高乐,成英燕,郑作亚,等.GNSS数据处理中框架点的选取方法研究[J].大地测量与地球动力学,2011,31(2):133-136,141. [11] 曹炳强,成英燕,许长辉,等.间距分区法在解算卫星连续运行站数据中的应用[J].测绘通报,2016(11):15-17. [12] 陈少星.GAMIT基线解算精度分析及应用[D].青岛:山东科技大学,2013. [13] 黄立人,高砚龙,任立生.关于NEU(ENU)坐标系统[J].大地测量与地球动力学,2006,26(1):97-99. [14] 郝明,朱良玉.不同ITRF参考框架NEU坐标系统下的速度场转换[J].大地测量与地球动力学,2013,33(6):130-132. [15] 傅彦博,朱新慧,孙付平,等.ITRF2014框架简介[J].大地测量与地球动力学,2017,37(5):446-449,461.
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 235
- HTML全文浏览量: 31
- PDF下载量: 106
- 被引次数: 0