Comparison and Analysis of Astronomical Refraction Correction Model
-
摘要: 天文大气折射一直是影响天文测量精度的主要因素之一,针对光学天文测量中大气折射的问题,主要介绍、归纳了几种在处理天文大气折射改正中常用的模型,并比较分析了标准大气条件下不同模型的改正效果,为天文大气折射模型改正的进一步研究提供基础。结果表明:在天顶距不大于60°的情况下,不同方法之间差异性很小,但随着天顶距的增大,不同方法的差异增大。对于高精度天文测量,需要寻求一种精度高、实用性强的处理方法对天文大气折射的影响进行改正和计算。Abstract: Atmospheric refraction is one of the main factors which affecting the accuracy of astronomical measurement all the time. The paper introduces and summarizes several commonly used models in computing atmospheric refraction corrections, compare and analysis the effect of different models under standard atmospheric conditions. It shows the difference between different methods is very small when the zenith distance is smaller than 60°, but with the increase of zenith distance, the difference of different methods increases. High precision method must been setup for high precision astronomical measurements.
-
[1] 夏一飞,黄天衣.球面天文学［M］. 南京:南京大学出版社,1993. [2] 中国科学院紫金山天文台,2017年中国天文年历［M］.北京:科学出版社,2017. [3] 武汉测绘学院天文与重力测量教研组. 大地天文学［M］.北京:中国工业出版社,1963. [4] 冒蔚,铁琼仙,杨磊.天文大气折射［M］.昆明:云南科技出版社,2004. [5] 张捍卫,等. 关于大气分布模型［J］. 天文研究与技术(国家天文台台刊), 2005,12, 2(4),278-284. [6] 信息工程大学测绘学院天文、重力及人卫大地测量教研室. 大地天文学［M］.郑州:测绘学院教材,2003. [7] HOTINE M. Mathematical Geodesy, Environmental Science Services Adminstration Monograph 2［S］.Washington,D.C., 1969,209. [8] 胡晓淳,范瑜. 关于天文折射［J］. 云南天文台台刊, 1986(2): 29-37. [9] 武志贤,黄坤仪. 评普尔科沃天文台大气折射表［J］. 紫金山天文台台刊, 1992, 11(3): 227-232. [10] KAPLAN G H, BANGERT J, BARTLETT J L, et al. Naval observatory vector astrometry software (NOVAS) version 30［C］.／／Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, 2009:523. [11] SEIDELMANN P K. Explanatory supplement to the astronomical almanac［M］. Organic Chemical Reagents, University of Illinois, 2014:341-367. [12] MURPHY G B, TRIBBLE A, D'ANGELO N, et al. The plasma wake of the shuttle orbiter［J］. Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, 1989, 94(A6):6866-6872. -
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 350
- HTML全文浏览量: 57
- PDF下载量: 46
- 被引次数: 0
下载:
