留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

多相关器联合功率GNSS欺骗干扰检测方法研究

赵慎 廖一霏 李世玲 周开军

赵慎, 廖一霏, 李世玲, 周开军. 多相关器联合功率GNSS欺骗干扰检测方法研究[J]. 全球定位系统, 2024, 49(4): 66-74. doi: 10.12265/j.gnss.2023235
引用本文: 赵慎, 廖一霏, 李世玲, 周开军. 多相关器联合功率GNSS欺骗干扰检测方法研究[J]. 全球定位系统, 2024, 49(4): 66-74. doi: 10.12265/j.gnss.2023235
ZHAO Shen, LIAO Yifei, LI Shiling, ZHOU Kaijun. Research on GNSS spoofing interference detection for multi-correlator combined power[J]. GNSS World of China, 2024, 49(4): 66-74. doi: 10.12265/j.gnss.2023235
Citation: ZHAO Shen, LIAO Yifei, LI Shiling, ZHOU Kaijun. Research on GNSS spoofing interference detection for multi-correlator combined power[J]. GNSS World of China, 2024, 49(4): 66-74. doi: 10.12265/j.gnss.2023235

多相关器联合功率GNSS欺骗干扰检测方法研究

doi: 10.12265/j.gnss.2023235
基金项目: 国家自然科学基金项目(61976088);湖南省教育厅科学研究项目(23A0464);湖南省研究生科研创新项目(QL20230271)
详细信息
    作者简介:

    赵慎:(1983—),男,博士,研究方向为阵列信号处理、导航时空信息安全. E-mail: zhaoshen_nudt@163.com

    廖一霏:(2000—),女,研究生,研究方向为导航时空信息安全. E-mail: liaoyifeifeifei@163.com

    李世玲:(1991—),女,博士,研究方向为多智能体系统非合作博弈. E-mail: lishilingjjwai@163.com

    周开军:(1979—),男,教授,研究方向为仿生视觉信息处理、生物特征识别. E-mail: zkj@hutb.edu.cn

    通信作者:

    廖一霏 E-mail: liaoyifeifeifei@163.com

  • 中图分类号: P228;TN972

Research on GNSS spoofing interference detection for multi-correlator combined power

  • 摘要: GNSS民用信号因其公开性和脆弱性易受外界欺骗干扰. 作为欺骗干扰检测的有效方法,信号质量监测(signal quality monitoring,SQM)技术通过检测接收机跟踪环路早码、即时码、晚码(early late phase,ELP)的相关结果,与无欺骗时的相关特性对比,判断是否存在欺骗干扰. 常规SQM算法仅利用ELP三个信息,检测性能受限,为此提出多相关器联合功率(SQM detection of power combined Multi-correlator groups,SPCM)算法. 以ELP之间多个等间隔相关器输出功率的加权为检测量,且取相关时刻与即时码时间差的反比为加权系数;进一步分析检测量的概率分布特性,并基于Neyman-Pearson理论确定最佳检测阈值,通过比较检测量与检测阈值的大小,判断是否存在欺骗干扰. 基于美国德克萨斯大学奥斯汀分校公开的场景四数据集进行试验,结果表明:与Ratio和ELP等典型SQM算法相比,在不同虚警率条件下,所提出SPCM算法兼具高检测概率和快速预警响应时间性能.

     

  • 图  1  欺骗攻击示意图

    图  2  多相关器实现框图

    图  3  不同自由度下的卡方分布

    图  4  SPCM检测量输出分布

    图  5  SPCM算法检验流程图

    图  6  61个相关器随时间变化的相关幅度输出图

    图  7  PRN6载噪比变化曲线

    图  8  传统SQM检测量示意图

    图  9  SPCM检测量随时间变化图

    图  10  检测概率对比

    图  11  ROC曲线对比

    图  12  不同检测量的二元判决结果

  • [1] ISLAM S, BHUIYAN M Z H, PAAKKONEN I, et al. Impact analysis of spoofing on different-grade GNSS receivers[C]//IEEE/ION Position, Location and Navigation Symposium, 2023: 492-499. DOI: 10.1109/PLANS53410.2023.10139934
    [2] TURNER M, WIMBUSH S, ENNEKING C, et al. Spoofing detection by distortion of the correlation function[C]//IEEE/ION Position, Location and Navigation Symposium, 2020: 566-574. DOI: 10.1109/PLANS46316.2020.9110173
    [3] 耿正霖, 聂俊伟, 王飞雪. GNSS抗欺骗干扰技术研究[J]. 全球定位系统, 2013, 38(4): 65-70.
    [4] 谢钢. GPS原理与接收机设计[M]. 北京: 电子工业出版社, 2009: 1-13.
    [5] WU Z J, LIANG C, ZHANG Y. Blockchain-based authentication of GNSS civil navigation message[J]. IEEE transactions on aerospace and electronic systems, 2023, 59(4): 4380-4392. DOI: 10.1109/TAES.2023.3241041
    [6] 任彬彬, 倪少杰, 陈飞强, 等. GNSS调零抗干扰天线的反欺骗性能分析[J]. 全球定位系统, 2021, 46(6): 30-36.
    [7] LEE Y S, YEOM J S, JUNG B C. A novel array antenna-based gnss spoofing detection and mitigation technique[C]//IEEE 20th Consumer Communications & Networking Conference (CCNC), 2023: 489-492. DOI: 10.1109/CCNC51644.2023.10060423
    [8] SAKORN C, SUPNITHI P. Calculating AGC and C/N0 thresholds of mobile for jamming detection[C]//The 18th International Conference on Electrical Engineering/Electronics, Computer, Telecommunications and Information Technology (ECTI-CON), 2021. DOI: 10.1109/ECTI-CON51831.2021.9454850
    [9] YANG B, TIAN M, JI Y W, et al. Research on GNSS spoofing mitigation technology based on spoofing correlation peak cancellation[J]. IEEE communications letters, 2022, 26(12): 3024-3028. DOI: 10.1109/LCOMM.2022.3204944
    [10] ZHANG X, DING C C, XIA H, et al. INS-Aided multi-antenna GNSS carrier phase double difference spoofing detection[J]. IEEE access, 2023(11): 19523-19533. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3247968
    [11] JAFARNIA-JAHROMI A, BROUMANDAN A, NIELSEN J, et al. GPS vulnerability to spoofing threats and a review of antispoofing techniques[J]. International journal of navigation and observation, 2012: 1-16. DOI: 10.1155/2012/127072
    [12] PHELTS R E. Multicorrelator techniques for robust mitigation of threats to GPS signal quality[D]. Palo Alto, Calif, USA: Stanford University, 2001.
    [13] MUBARAK O M, DEMPSTER A G. Performance comparison of ELP and DELP for multipath detection[C]//International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of the Institute of Navigation, 2009.
    [14] MUBARAK O M, DEMPSTER A G. Analysis of early late phase in single-and dual-frequency GPS receivers for multipath detection[J]. GPS solutions, 2010, 14(4): 381-388. DOI: 10.1007/S10291-010-0162-Z
    [15] SUN C, CHEONG J W, DEMPSTER A G, et al. GNSS spoofing detection by means of signal quality monitoring (SQM) metric combinations[J]. IEEE access, 2018(6): 66428-66441. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2875948
    [16] SUN C, CHEONG J W, DEMPSTER A G, et al. Moving variance-based signal quality monitoring method for spoofing detection[J]. GPS solutions, 2018, 22(3): 83. DOI: 10.1007/s10291-018-0745-7
    [17] WANG W Y, LI N, WU R B, et al. Detection of induced GNSS spoofing using S-Curve-Bias[J]. Sensors, 2019, 19(4): 922. DOI: 10.3390/s19040922
    [18] 王文益, 龚婧, 王金铭. 基于SCB方差的GNSS欺骗式干扰检测算法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2021, 43(8): 2254-2262.
    [19] 王璐, 张林杰, 吴仁彪. 功率监测与SQM融合的GNSS欺骗干扰检测[J]. 信号处理, 2023, 39(3): 505-515.
    [20] ZHOU W L, LV Z W, DENG X, et al. A new induced GNSS spoofing detection method based on weighted second-order central moment[J]. IEEE sensors journal, 2022, 22(12): 12064-12078. DOI: 10.1109/jsen.2022.3174019
    [21] JAHROMI A J. GNSS signal authenticity verification in the presence of structural interference[D].Department of Geomatics Engineering, University of Calgary, 2013. DOI: 10.11575/PRISM/26310
    [22] JAHROMI A J, BROUMANDAN A, NIELSEN J, et al. GPS spoofer countermeasure effectiveness based on signal strength, noise power, and C/N0 measurements[J]. International journal of satellite communications and networks, 2012, 30(4): 181-191. DOI: 10.1002/sat.1012
    [23] KHAN A M, IQBAL N, KHAN A A, et al. Detection of intermediate spoofing attack on global navigation satellite system receiver through slope based metrics[J]. The journal of navigation, 2020, 73(5): 1052-1068. DOI: 10.1017/S0373463320000168
    [24] SENGIJPTA S K. Fundamentals of statistical signal processing: estimation theory[J]. Technometrics, 1995, 37(4): 465-466. DOI: 10.1080/00401706.1995.10484391
    [25] HUMPHREYS T E, BHATTI J A, SHEPARD D P, et al. The texas spoofing test battery: toward a standard for evaluating gps signal authentication techniques[C]//International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of the Institute of Navigation, 2012. DOI: 10.15781/T26D5PT4X
  • 加载中
图(12)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  134
  • HTML全文浏览量:  34
  • PDF下载量:  13
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2023-12-25
  • 录用日期:  2023-12-25
  • 网络出版日期:  2024-07-05

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回