留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

基于多通道SQM指标联合的矢量接收机多径干扰检测方法

贾琼琼 朱传胜

贾琼琼, 朱传胜. 基于多通道SQM指标联合的矢量接收机多径干扰检测方法[J]. 全球定位系统, 2023, 48(3): 110-119. doi: 10.12265/j.gnss.2023037
引用本文: 贾琼琼, 朱传胜. 基于多通道SQM指标联合的矢量接收机多径干扰检测方法[J]. 全球定位系统, 2023, 48(3): 110-119. doi: 10.12265/j.gnss.2023037
JIA Qiongqiong, ZHU Chuansheng. Multipath interference detection method for vector receivers based on joint multi-channel SQM metrics[J]. GNSS World of China, 2023, 48(3): 110-119. doi: 10.12265/j.gnss.2023037
Citation: JIA Qiongqiong, ZHU Chuansheng. Multipath interference detection method for vector receivers based on joint multi-channel SQM metrics[J]. GNSS World of China, 2023, 48(3): 110-119. doi: 10.12265/j.gnss.2023037

基于多通道SQM指标联合的矢量接收机多径干扰检测方法

doi: 10.12265/j.gnss.2023037
基金项目: 中国民航大学民航航班广域监视与安全管控技术重点实验室开放基金(202202)
详细信息
    作者简介:

    贾琼琼:(1986—),女,硕士,副教授,研究方向为信号处理在卫星导航中的应用研究

    朱传胜:(1997—),男,硕士,研究方向为卫星导航与多径干扰监测

    通信作者:

    贾琼琼 E-mail: qqjia@cauc.edu.cn

  • 中图分类号: P228.4

Multipath interference detection method for vector receivers based on joint multi-channel SQM metrics

  • 摘要: 矢量接收机利用各跟踪通道间信息共享达到通道间相互辅助的作用,因此相对于传统的标量接收机能在复杂环境下提供更好的性能. 然而在城市峡谷等复杂环境下,多径传输会严重限制矢量接收机的性能,若能及时发现多径并加以处理则能消除多径干扰的影响. 本文从多径对矢量接收机的影响机理出发,研究基于信号质量监测(SQM)的多径检测问题. 在分析现有的针对标量接收机信号SQM指标的基础上,结合矢量接收机通道耦合的特点,提出一种联合多通道SQM指标的矢量接收机多径检测方法. 最后,通过仿真实验验证了所提方法能够有效地检测与直达信号幅度比小于0.5、相对码延时在0.3~0.6码片的多径干扰.

     

  • 图  1  多径干扰下的自相关函数

    图  2  标量接收机跟踪结构

    图  3  矢量接收机跟踪结构

    图  4  多径干扰下矢量跟踪中不同跟踪通道信号相关函数

    图  5  多径干扰下Ratio和Delta指标变化

    图  6  多径干扰下Double Delta、ELP、Slope和文献[16]提出的指标变化

    图  7  Ratio指标和Delta指标取绝对值后的直方图以及理论概率密度函数曲线

    图  8  本文方法流程图

    图  9  SQM指标检测率随时间变化趋势

    图  10  SQM指标检测率随虚警率变化趋势

    图  11  SQM指标检测率随多径码延时变化趋势

    图  12  SQM指标检测率随多径相对幅度变化趋势

    图  13  多通道联合指标检测率随时间变化趋势

    图  14  多通道联合指标检测率随虚警率变化趋势

    图  15  多通道联合指标检测率随码延时变化趋势

    图  16  多通道联合指标检测率随多径相对幅度变化趋势

    图  17  二次检测后多通道联合指标检测率随虚警率变化趋势

    表  1  常用的SQM指标

    接收机类型指标名称指标计算表达式均值
    标量跟踪Delta[3]$\displaystyle\frac{ { {I_{\rm{E}}} - {I_{\rm{L}}} } }{ { {I_{\rm{P}}} } }$0
    Ratio[3]$\displaystyle\frac{ { {I_{\rm{E}}} + {I_{\rm{L}}} } }{ { {I_{\rm{P}}} } }$1.9
    Double Delta[6]$\displaystyle\frac{ {({I_{ {{\rm{E}}_1} } } - {I_{ {{\rm{L}}_1} } }) - ({I_{ {{\rm{E}}_2} } } - {I_{ {{\rm{L}}_2} } })} }{ { {I_{\rm{P}}} } }$0
    ELP[8]${\arctan }\left( {\displaystyle\frac{ { {Q_{\rm{E} } } } }{ { {I_{\rm{E} } } } } } \right) - {\arctan }\left( {\displaystyle\frac{ { {Q_{\rm{L} } } } }{ { {I_{\rm{L} } } } } } \right)$0
    Slope[15]$\displaystyle\frac{ {2 \cdot ({I_{ {{\rm{L}}_1} } } - {I_{ {{\rm{L}}_2} } })} }{ { {I_{\rm{P}}}({d_1} - {d_2})} }$−1
    矢量跟踪文献[16]$\left\{ \begin{gathered} \frac{ { {I_{\rm{P}}} - {I_{\rm{L}}} } }{ { {I_{\rm{E}}} + {I_{\rm{L}}} } }{\text{ } }\left| { {I_{\rm{E}}} } \right| \geqslant \left| { {I_{\rm{L}}} } \right| \\ \frac{ { {I_{\rm{P}}} - {I_{\rm{E}}} } }{ { {I_{\rm{E}}} + {I_{\rm{L}}} } }{\text{ } }\left| { {I_{\rm{E}}} } \right| < \left| { {I_{\rm{L}}} } \right| \\ \end{gathered} \right.$0.5
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  仿真实验参数设置

    相关参数取值
    接收机中频/MHz1.405
    接收机采样率/MHz5.714
    数据长度/s30
    多径干扰时间/s10~20
    受干扰卫星号2
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] 谢钢. GPS原理与接收机设计[M]. 北京: 电子工业出版社, 2009.
    [2] PIRSIAVASH A, BROUMANDAN A, LACHAPELLE G. Characterization of signal quality monitoring techniques for multipath detection in GNSS applications[J]. Sensors, 2017, 17(7): 1579. DOI: 10.3390/s17071579
    [3] IRSIGLER M. Multipath propagation, mitigation and monitoring in the light of Galileo and the modernized GPS[D]. Munich: Bundeswehr University, 2008.
    [4] FANTINO M, MOLINO A, MULASSANO P, et al. Signal quality monitoring: correlation mask based on ratio test metrics for multipath detection [C]// Proceedings of IGNSS Symposium 2009.
    [5] FRANCO-PATINO D M, SECO-GRANADOS G, DOVIS F. Signal quality checks for multipath detection in GNSS[C]// International Conference on Localization and GNSS (ICL-GNSS), 2013.
    [6] PIRSIAVASH A, BROUMANDAN A, LACHAPELLE G. Performance evaluation of signal quality monitoring techniques for GNSS multipath detection and mitigation[C]//International Technical Symposium on Navigation and Timing (ITSNT), 2017.
    [7] MUBARAK O, DEMPSTER A G. Performance comparison of ELP and DELP for multipath detection[C]// Proceedings of the 22nd International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of The Institute of Navigation (ION GNSS 2009), 2009: 2276-2283.
    [8] MUBARAK O M, DEMPSTER A G. Analysis of early late phase in single-and dual-frequency GPS receivers for multipath detection[J]. GPS solutions, 2010, 14(1): 381-388. DOI: 10.1007/s10291-010-0162-z
    [9] AMANI E, DE BOER J R, VIGNEAU W, et al. GPS multipath induced errors for the vector tracking loop: insight into multipath detection[C]//European Navigation Conference (ENC 2016). 2016.
    [10] AMANI E, DJOUANI K, DE BOER J R, et al. Correlator-based multipath detection technique for a global positioning system/GNSS receiver[J]. IET radar, sonar and navigation, 2018, 12(7): 783-793. DOI: 10.1049/iet-rsn.2017.0379
    [11] LUO Y, WANG Y Q, WU S L, et al. Multipath effects on vector tracking algorithm for GNSS signal[J]. Science china information sciences, 2014, 10(57): 1-13. DOI: 10.1007/s11432-014-5153-1
    [12] 张欣然, 李洪, 杨春, 等. 欺骗干扰对GNSS矢量跟踪环路的影响[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 62(1): 163-171.
    [13] ZHAO S H, LU M Q, FENG Z M. Implementation and performance assessment of a vector tracking method based on a software GPS receiver[J]. Journal of navigation, 2011, 64(S1): S151-S161. DOI: 10.1017/S0373463311000440
    [14] PIRSIAVASH A, BROUMANDAN A, LACHAPELLE G. How effective are signal quality monitoring techniques for GNSS multipath detection[J/OL]. (2018-01-01)[2023-01-20]. Inside GNSS, 2018, 13(1): 40-47.
    [15] KHAN A M, IQBAL N, KHAN A A, et al. Detection of intermediate spoofing attack on global GNSS receiver through slope based metrics[J]. Journal of navigation, 2020, 73(5): 1052-1068. DOI: 10.1017/S0373463320000168
    [16] ZHANG X R, LI H, YANG C, et al. Signal quality monitoring spoofing identification methods for GNSS vector tracking structure[C]//Proceedings of the 2021 International Technical Meeting of The Institute of Navigation, 2021.
    [17] SUN C, CHEONG J W, DEMPSTER A G, et al. GNSS spoofing detection by means of signal quality monitoring (SQM) metric combinations[J]. IEEE access, 2018, 99(6): 1-1. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2875948
    [18] WIPER M P, GIRON F J, PEWSEY A. Objective bayesian inference for the half-normal and half-t distributions[J]. Communications in statistics—theory and methods, 2008, 37(20): 3165-3185. DOI: 10.1080/03610920802105184
    [19] MANFREDINI E G, DOVIS F, MOTELLA B. Validation of a signal quality monitoring technique over a set of spoofed scenarios[C]//2014 7th ESA Workshop on Satellite Navigation Technologies and European Workshop on GNSS Signals and Signal Processing (NAVITEC), 2014.
  • 加载中
图(17) / 表(2)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  305
  • HTML全文浏览量:  125
  • PDF下载量:  47
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2023-03-08

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回